Not as observers, and not as managers, but as participants in a living, relational system.

Over time, this way of being changed.

Across generations, through the influence of religion, science, and technological development, other animals and the more-than-human came to be understood differently. At times as mechanical. At times as unfeeling. At times as lacking soul.

These ideas did not remain abstract. They shaped how humans related, decided, and acted.

What was once known became less visible.

And eventually, unfamiliar.

We now see this in moments of surprise.

When other animals are observed using tools.
When they form bonds, families, and communities.
When they respond, communicate, and participate in ways that mirror what humans recognise in themselves.

These moments are often described as discovery.

What if they are not discoveries at all?
What if they are reminders?

The surprise itself points to something deeper.
Something in human perception has shifted.

A forgetting has taken place.

This forgetting is not only historical. It is ongoing.

It is reflected in how we study, define, and attempt to understand other beings. Even in the development of tools designed to decode or translate communication, there can be an underlying assumption that meaning exists only when it can be measured or verified in human terms.

What has been forgotten is not only what other beings are capable of.
It is also how to recognise and relate to them.

And yet, the recognition is not entirely lost.

It appears in moments of connection.
In instinct.
In quiet knowing.

What we forget is not only held in what we no longer see.
It is also carried in how we speak, name, and define.

What feels familiar in this, even if it has not been named?
Where do we recognise knowing, before explanation?

← Back to Insights